ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Grooming as a window into the post-stress recuperative process.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alterations in rodent self-grooming have been used to model various facets of neuropsychiatric illness. In the context of affective behavior, increases in grooming have been proposed as a sign of stress. This is because grooming has been observed to increase in close temporal proximity to stressful events. However, in other situations, stress appears to suppress grooming, complicating the utility of measuring grooming in the study of stress and mental health. Here, we show that this discrepancy can be resolved by considering time and experimental context. We found that in initial response to stress, grooming declined in proportion to stressor intensity. Moreover, stress-related cues and anxiogenic stimuli similarly suppressed grooming. Conversely, optogenetic inhibition of the amygdala in a stress-associated context decreased threat-elicited freezing, consistent with a reduction in stress, and increased grooming. These results indicate that the immediate response to stress is a suppression of grooming. However, when stressed mice were returned to their homecage environment, grooming increased. Similarly, mice increased grooming when they returned to the safe zone in an anxiety assay. Accordingly, rather than being a defensive response to signs of danger, increased grooming seems to reflect a post-stress response that occurs once animals detect the absence of danger. These findings suggest that post-stress grooming could provide a window into the neurobiology of post-stress recuperative processes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.