ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
GeneKnow: An auditable AI framework for source-grounded biological evidence synthesis.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological function is context dependent, yet synthesizing evidence for a gene's function in a defined cell type, disease, or perturbation remains labor-intensive. Here we present GeneKnow, an auditable artificial intelligence (AI) framework for source-grounded biological evidence synthesis. GeneKnow separates evidence-critical operations, including literature retrieval, passage selection, provenance tracking, and bibliography construction, from generative steps that are constrained to semantic analysis and literature synthesis. GeneKnow supports multi-paper discovery and single-paper inspection while preserving links from synthesized claims to source passages, generating trustworthy syntheses without fabricated citations and minimizing hallucinations. Systematic benchmarking showed that GeneKnow achieved higher claim support and citation fidelity than leading general-purpose and scientific AI systems. These results demonstrate that an AI system with controlled division of labor between deterministic and generative components can substantially improve the fidelity and auditability of biomedical literature synthesis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.