ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Modeling the journey as well as the destination: a control theory account of rotational navigation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Navigation requires estimating heading and transforming these estimates into actions. Prior models explain how self-motion and landmark cues are combined into heading estimates, but less is known about how these estimates are iteratively transformed into motor commands to reach a goal. Here, we hypothesized that navigation operates as a closed-loop process in which ongoing movement is updated by sensory prediction errors. To test this hypothesis, participants performed a goal-directed rotation task in virtual reality. On select trials, visual landmarks were shifted during movement, inducing a prediction error between the heading expected from self-motion estimates and the heading observed from the shifted landmarks. In parallel, we developed a closed-loop model of turning behavior that represents heading and angular velocity as jointly estimated states over time. This model accounts not only for final position-the destination-but also for the movement dynamics that produce it-the journey. The model predicts that landmark-induced visual prediction errors should produce rapid corrective changes in movement. Participant turning behavior qualitatively paralleled these model dynamics: acceleration changed after visual feedback, with larger landmark mismatches producing larger corrective responses. Together, these findings suggest that naturalistic movement depends on continuously transforming heading estimates into motor command through closed-loop control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.