Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282596›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Modeling the journey as well as the destination: a control theory account of rotational navigation.

Yinqi Huang, Abhilasha Vishwanath, Yu Karen Du, Matthew F Watson, Osama Asiri, Karlee Dakin, Donette Markham, Arne D Ekstrom, Robert C Wilson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yinqi HuangSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2905-0138
Abhilasha VishwanathDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8283-0141
Yu Karen DuDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-0430
Matthew F WatsonDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Osama AsiriDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-5633-6493
Karlee DakinDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Donette MarkhamDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Arne D EkstromDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6812-2368
Robert C WilsonSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Characterizing the cognitive computations underlying spatial navigationR21MH134100 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI EKSTROM, ARNE D, WILSON, ROBERT C · 2023 to 2023
$412k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH134100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navigation requires estimating heading and transforming these estimates into actions. Prior models explain how self-motion and landmark cues are combined into heading estimates, but less is known about how these estimates are iteratively transformed into motor commands to reach a goal. Here, we hypothesized that navigation operates as a closed-loop process in which ongoing movement is updated by sensory prediction errors. To test this hypothesis, participants performed a goal-directed rotation task in virtual reality. On select trials, visual landmarks were shifted during movement, inducing a prediction error between the heading expected from self-motion estimates and the heading observed from the shifted landmarks. In parallel, we developed a closed-loop model of turning behavior that represents heading and angular velocity as jointly estimated states over time. This model accounts not only for final position-the destination-but also for the movement dynamics that produce it-the journey. The model predicts that landmark-induced visual prediction errors should produce rapid corrective changes in movement. Participant turning behavior qualitatively paralleled these model dynamics: acceleration changed after visual feedback, with larger landmark mismatches producing larger corrective responses. Together, these findings suggest that naturalistic movement depends on continuously transforming heading estimates into motor command through closed-loop control.

Indexed as

control theorycue combinationpath integrationprediction error

Identifiers

PMID42282596
PMCPMC13252111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.