Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282562›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Distinguishing Photoacoustic and Photothermal Neuron Stimulation Through Quantitative Mapping Spatiotemporal Field Evolution.

Deming Li, Andrew Cheng, Xinrui Gong, Haoxin Huang, Yueming Li, Yifan Zhu, Edward A Nelson, Ji-Xin Cheng, Guo Chen, Chen Yang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deming LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8167-3476
Andrew ChengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Xinrui GongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Haoxin HuangDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Yueming LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Yifan ZhuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Edward A NelsonDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ji-Xin ChengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Guo ChenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Chen YangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Close-Loop Deep Brain Optoacoustic Stimulation at Sub-millimeter PrecisionR21NS145121 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI YANG, CHEN · 2025 to 2025
$466k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS145121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulation is a rapidly advancing strategy for modulating brain function and treating neurological disorders, yet the mechanisms of optical neural stimulation remain incompletely understood. A central challenge is that photoacoustic (PA) and photothermal (PT) effects are typically generated simultaneously and evolve on overlapping spatial and temporal scales, making their contributions to neuronal activation difficult to distinguish. Here, we overcome this limitation by integrating two carbon-based emitters with a spatial-offset pump-probe imaging platform to distinguish PA and PT neuromodulation through direct mapping of spatiotemporal field evolution. The two emitters produce nearly identical thermal fields while exhibiting a 26-fold difference in acoustic output, enabling decoupled comparison of thermal and acoustic contributions. To directly characterize the physical fields, we establish a spatial-offset pump-probe imaging system capable of visualizing both temperature and pressure evolution, confirming matched thermal profiles between the two emitters. Neuronal stimulation experiments further show that neurons are markedly more responsive to PA stimulation than to PT stimulation. Beyond resolving a longstanding mechanistic question, this work demonstrates the enhanced efficiency of PA stimulation and provides general guidance for designing high-performance optical neural interfaces.

Indexed as

nanomaterialneural stimulationnon-genetic neuromodulationphotoacousticphotothermal

Identifiers

PMID42282562
PMCPMC13252000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.