Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282516›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Flexible route planning and rapid structure learning by mice in complex environments.

Michael Pereira, Beatriz S Godinho, Christian K Machens, Rui M Costa, Thomas Akam

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael PereiraChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-3759
Beatriz S GodinhoChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-6546
Christian K MachensChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1717-1562
Rui M CostaChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0495-8374
Thomas AkamChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-0494

Funding

Modeling multi-area dynamics during motor controlU19NS104649 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI COSTA, RUI M. · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104649Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action selection using predictive models of the environment plays a fundamental role in human and animal behaviour, yet is poorly understood at circuit and algorithmic levels. Spatial navigation is an attractive domain for characterising how world models guide action selection. However spatial behaviours are shaped by multiple control systems including habits, vector-navigation using a Euclidean model of spatial relationships, and route planning using models of environment structure. Understanding how world models support navigation requires assays that dissociate control systems and decorrelate behavioural variables, while generating large datasets that allow precise quantification of brain-behaviour relationships. Here we developed and computationally optimised a behavioural assay to quantify flexible navigation using knowledge of environment structure. Mice navigated to visually cued goals in complex mazes, with randomised start and goal locations on each trial, generating thousands of non-repetitive goal-directed navigation trajectories. They navigated efficiently - strongly favouring options on the shortest path-to-goal, and learnt rapidly - demonstrating knowledge of maze structure from their first sessions in new environments. We anticipate the assay will be useful for characterising how world models support flexible behaviour.

Identifiers

PMID42282516
PMCPMC13251939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.