ArticlePlant diversity2026
Is beta diversity higher in seed plants with larger body sizes?
Article in Plant diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beta diversity is a scalar linking local (alpha) with regional (gamma) species diversity. Understanding patterns of beta diversity is central to ecology and biogeography. It is suggested that beta diversity should be higher for organisms with larger body sizes, which is called the beta diversity-body size hypothesis, because organisms with smaller body sizes are considered to be better dispersers and thus would be expected to have lower rates of species turnover between areas, compared with organisms with larger body sizes. Using a comprehensive database of seed plants in North America, I test this hypothesis. Beta diversity was measured by Simpson's dissimilarity index. Seed plants were divided into three categories (trees, shrubs and herbs), which represent large, intermediate and small body sizes, respectively. While beta diversity in shrubs is higher than that in herbs, supporting the hypothesis, beta diversity in trees is lower than that in shrubs and herbs, contrary to the hypothesis. These findings hold true regardless of whether North America is considered as a whole or different latitudinal zones are considered separately. Thus, the overall finding of this study only partially supports the hypothesis. This study also shows that in all the three groups of plants, beta diversity decreases with increasing latitude, and is more strongly related with geographic distance than with climatic distance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.