ArticleSports medicine and health science2026
Variability in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity assessment: Comparing tri-axial accelerometry cut-off points in children.
Article in Sports medicine and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the most frequently used cut-points (CoPs) on quantification of active children, as well as to analyse children physical activity (PA) quantification using vertical axis and vector magnitude (VM). The sample comprised 303 children (160 girls) aged 6 years-10 years. Height, weight and BMI were assessed to control for confounding variables related to PA levels. The tri-axial accelerometer was used for seven consecutive days of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behaviour (SB); especific pediatric cut-points for children (Evenson; Freedson; Puyau; Pulsford; and Mattocks) were used. A general linear model was used; the agreements of all CoPs were analyzed by Kappa index. Freedson CoPs presented the highest percentage of active children (100%) for males and females during the weekdays, weekend, and for total assessed days. The Mattocks CoPs revealed the lowest proportion of active children for the weekdays (2.97%), weekend days (3.30%), and for the seven assessed days (1.65%). The interpretation of accelerometer results must be critiqued in respect to whether children are meeting publicly adopted PA guidelines. The growing variety of analytical approaches and CoPs employed to analyse and evaluate accelerometer data in children makes it difficult to compare findings across different studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.