Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282455›Full record

ArticleSports medicine and health science2026

Perspective: A head-to-toe view on athletic locomotion with an emphasis on assessing core stability.

Erika Zemková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erika ZemkováDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although much research has been devoted to gait analysis while walking or running, a surprising gap in knowledge is its relationship with upper body function, particularly core stability. The methods used to train and assess athletic locomotion are mainly focused on the lower limbs, while the upper body is often overlooked. Yet, proper body alignment from feet to head is essential for applying maximum force to the ground, thereby moving faster and more efficiently. It is believed that the core, which connects the upper and lower body, should be strong. The training of many athletes is therefore aimed at developing core muscle strength. However, for most of them, rigid core musculature associated with reduced spinal mobility may not be beneficial. Instead, core strength should be developed to the extent that allows race walkers and runners to optimize their performance. Accordingly, methods reflecting the functional nature of core strength, along with measures of postural alignment and lateral lumbopelvic stability, should be used to assess training effectiveness. To this end, a comprehensive head-to-toe approach to the assessment of athletic locomotion is recommended. Special emphasis should be placed on the role of postural and core stability in walking and running gait.

Indexed as

AthletesCore strengthPostural alignmentRunning and walking gaitTrunk rotational mobility

Identifiers

PMID42282455
PMCPMC13250204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.