ArticleSports medicine and health science2026
Perspective: A head-to-toe view on athletic locomotion with an emphasis on assessing core stability.
Article in Sports medicine and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Neurophysiological basis of the relationship between core stability and human movement: implications for sport and rehabilitation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Relation between core strength, core stability, and athletic performance-a mediation analysis approach.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although much research has been devoted to gait analysis while walking or running, a surprising gap in knowledge is its relationship with upper body function, particularly core stability. The methods used to train and assess athletic locomotion are mainly focused on the lower limbs, while the upper body is often overlooked. Yet, proper body alignment from feet to head is essential for applying maximum force to the ground, thereby moving faster and more efficiently. It is believed that the core, which connects the upper and lower body, should be strong. The training of many athletes is therefore aimed at developing core muscle strength. However, for most of them, rigid core musculature associated with reduced spinal mobility may not be beneficial. Instead, core strength should be developed to the extent that allows race walkers and runners to optimize their performance. Accordingly, methods reflecting the functional nature of core strength, along with measures of postural alignment and lateral lumbopelvic stability, should be used to assess training effectiveness. To this end, a comprehensive head-to-toe approach to the assessment of athletic locomotion is recommended. Special emphasis should be placed on the role of postural and core stability in walking and running gait.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.