ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2025
FEDERATED LEARNING OF ROBUST INDIVIDUALIZED DECISION RULES WITH APPLICATION TO HETEROGENEOUS MULTIHOSPITAL SEPSIS POPULATION.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating Optimal Site-Specific Individualized Treatment Rules With Limited Data Sharing.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- FEDERATED LEARNING OF ROBUST INDIVIDUALIZED DECISION RULES WITH APPLICATION TO HETEROGENEOUS MULTIHOSPITAL SEPSIS POPULATION.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition affecting millions of individuals in the U.S. each year. The complexity of sepsis clinical management makes individualized treatment approaches desirable. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) has collected electronic health records data of sepsis patients from multiple hospitals. The goal of this study is to derive individualized decision rules (IDRs) that could be safely applied to and uniformly improve decision-making across hospitals in the UPMC Health System by only using a subset of hospitals for training. Traditional approaches assume that data are sampled from a single population of interest. With multiple hospitals that vary in patient populations, treatments, and provider teams, an IDR that is successful in one hospital may not be as effective in another, and the performance achieved by a globally optimal IDR may vary greatly across hospitals, preventing it from being safely applied to unseen hospitals. To address these challenges as well as the practical restriction of data sharing across hospitals, we introduce a new objective function and a federated learning algorithm for learning IDRs that are robust to distributional uncertainty from heterogeneous data. The proposed framework uses a conditional maximin objective to enhance individual outcomes across hospitals, ensuring robustness against hospital-level variations. Compared to the traditional approach, the proposed method enhances the survival rate by 10 percentage points among patients who may experience extreme adverse outcomes across hospitals. Additionally, it increases the overall survival rate by two to three percentage points when the learned IDR is applied to unseen hospital populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.