ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparative evaluation of osseointegration among different surface modification techniques in dental implants.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal osseointegration determines long-term dental implant success, yet the comparative effectiveness of surface modifications (SLA, TPS, HA, machined) remains insufficiently defined despite extensive research. This prospective study evaluated 120 implants across 80 patients randomized to sandblasted large-grit acid-etched (SLA), titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS), hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) or machined surfaces, measuring ISQ, marginal bone loss and BIC at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. SLA demonstrated superior ISQ (78.42±4.21) and BIC (72.18±6.34%) at 24 weeks versus machined surfaces (p<0.05), with HA performing closely second; TPS showed intermediate results. SLA surface modification yielded the highest osseointegration parameters, minimizing bone loss while maximizing stability across follow-up intervals. This helps to advance implantology by confirming SLA's clinical superiority over alternatives, guiding surface selection to optimize treatment predictability and longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.