Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282427›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Linking clinical presentation and histopathological data in perforation peritonitis.

Kusum Mahour, Pradeep Rathore, Aasha Baghel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kusum MahourDepartment of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Datia, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Pradeep RathoreDepartment of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Datia, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Aasha BaghelDepartment of Pathology, Government Medical College, Datia, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perforated peritonitis presents a diagnostic challenge because clinical manifestations often poorly correlate with the underlying histopathological severity and etiology. This prospective observational study included 50 patients with perforated peritonitis who underwent emergency laparotomy, assessing clinical parameters such as presenting symptoms, duration of illness, pain location, hemodynamic status and laboratory findings. Intraoperative details including the site and size of perforation, degree of peritoneal contamination and associated pathology were recorded and histopathological examination was performed on resected specimens and biopsy samples from perforation margins. Statistical analysis revealed a strong association between clinical presentation and histopathological severity, confirming that clinical features can reflect the underlying pathological burden. Thus, histopathological analysis is indispensable for accurate etiological diagnosis and for guiding postoperative management in perforated peritonitis.

Indexed as

clinical correlationgastrointestinal perforationhistopathologylaparotomyPerforation peritonitis

Identifiers

PMID42282427
PMCPMC13252265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.