Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282422›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Cleaning ability of two irrigating solutions in primary root canals.

P Nihar, Deepthi M, Mrunal Kalambe, Saloni Jain, Saurabh Prasad, Kavimalar Ravichandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P NiharDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, CKS Theja Dental College, Tirupati, DR. N.T.R University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Deepthi MDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, SM Hills, KS Layout, Bengaluru, India.
Mrunal KalambeDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Dr. Rajesh Ramdasji Kambe Dental College, Akola, India.
Saloni JainDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and hospital, Sangli, India.
Saurabh PrasadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Career post graduate Institute Of Dental Sciences, Lucknow.
Kavimalar RavichandranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective cleaning of primary root canals remains challenging due to complex anatomy and physiological root resorption, limiting the efficacy of mechanical instrumentation alone. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the cleaning ability of 1% sodium hypochlorite and normal saline as irrigating solutions in primary teeth. Forty extracted primary molars were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 20), instrumented using standardized techniques, and irrigated with either sodium hypochlorite or saline, followed by stereomicroscopic evaluation of residual debris in different canal thirds. The sodium hypochlorite group showed significantly lower debris scores at all levels, particularly in the apical third, compared to the saline group (p < 0.05). Thus, we show that 1% sodium hypochlorite provides superior cleaning efficacy and may be preferred for pulpectomy procedures in primary teeth.

Indexed as

debris removalnormal salinePrimary teethpulpectomyroot canal irrigationsodium hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID42282422
PMCPMC13252259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.