Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282416›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparison of slot wall deformation in conventional and self-ligating brackets during torque with TMA wire - A finite element analysis.

C Keerthana, P Siri Krishna, Pavan Kumar, Manjunath Hegde, C Chaitra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C KeerthanaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bangalore Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
P Siri KrishnaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bangalore Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pavan KumarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bangalore Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Manjunath HegdeDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bangalore Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
C ChaitraDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bangalore Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slot wall deformation occurs when twisting of the wire is increased. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate deformation in conventional, active and passive self-ligating stainless steel and ceramic brackets with 0.019 X 0.025inch TMA wire. Deformation of slot wall with TMA wire was least in ceramic passive self- ligating bracket ranging from 0.02 to 0.50 mm and highest in Stainless steel conventional bracket anging from 0.097 to 2.04 mm. Sequence of brackets from least to high slot wall deformation is Ceramic Passive Self-ligating bracket, Ceramic Active Self-ligating bracket, Stainless steel Passive Self-ligating bracket, Ceramic conventional bracket, Stainless steel Active Self-ligating bracket and Stainless-steel conventional bracket. Thus, elastic deformation of stainless-steel bracket slot was more than ceramic bracket slot.

Indexed as

ceramic bracketFEMself-ligating bracketslot wall deformationtitanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) wireTorque

Identifiers

PMID42282416
PMCPMC13252281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.