ArticleBioinformation2026
Jaw relation recording using nick and notch technique with intraoral gothic arch tracing in completely edentulous patients: A clinical study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recording centric and protrusive jaw relations in completely edentulous patients remain a critical yet challenging step in complete denture fabrication. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the consistency of jaw relation records obtained using Nick and Notch, intraoral Gothic arch tracing and extraoral Gothic arch tracing methods with split-cast mounting on a semi-adjustable articulator. Hence, twenty edentulous subjects (45-60 years) were evaluated and discrepancies were measured at right lateral, left lateral and anterior points using a digital Vernier caliper. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test demonstrated that the Nick and Notch technique exhibited the least discrepancy, while extraoral Gothic arch tracing showed the highest inconsistency, with intraoral tracing demonstrating intermediate values. The Nick and Notch technique was found to provide the most reliable jaw relation records, with intraoral Gothic arch tracing being more accurate than extraoral tracing, likely due to reduced muscular interference and closer approximation to the condylar rotational axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.