ArticleBioinformation2026
Condom catheter tamponade versus surgical adjuncts for PPH in placenta previa and accreta: A prospective study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage in placenta previa and accreta is difficult to manage, especially in low-resource settings where costly devices like Bakri balloons are not readily available. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the effectiveness of a condom catheter in controlling hemorrhage during 29 cesarean deliveries. Patients were managed with tamponade alone or in combination with placental bed suturing and/or uterine artery ligation. Results showed significant differences in hemostasis time and blood loss. The combination of tamponade with uterine artery ligation was most effective, while placental bed suturing increased blood loss and tamponade alone resulted in delayed hemostasis. Thus, we show that condom catheter tamponade combined with uterine artery ligation is an effective and affordable option for managing hemorrhage in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.