Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282400›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Patient knowledge and acceptance of radiation safety measures correlated to actual exposure records: A survey study.

Avinash Nachkunte Lakshmipathy, Zainab Haider Khan, Madhur Gupta, Aisha Mohammed Kutty, Gourav Singh Shekhawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Avinash Nachkunte LakshmipathyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Wales, United Kingdom.
Zainab Haider KhanDepartment of Radiology, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curaçao.
Madhur GuptaDepartment of Biochemistry, NKPSIMS and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Aisha Mohammed KuttyDepartment of Oncology and Haematology, Portsmouth University Hospital NHS trust, Wessex, United Kingdom.
Gourav Singh ShekhawatDepartment of Community Medicine, Rajasthan University of Health Science and Jai Durga College of Nursing, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing prevalence of the use of ionising radiation as a method of medical imaging, it is important to promote patient involvement in the effect of ionising radiation and its relation to medical imaging. Therefore, it is of interest to assess knowledge and acceptance of radiation safety practices amongst 255 adult patients and to compare the results of this survey to patients recorded exposure to radiation. The survey indicated that only 38% of respondents had a high level of understanding of radiation safety practices and only 42% accepted all recommended practices. Patients in the study experienced a mean exposure dose of 4.2 ± 1.8 mSv. Patients with higher levels of knowledge and acceptance of radiation safety practices were associated with less exposure to radiation (p < 0.05) and also predicted decreased exposure to radiation after multivariable adjustment (p < 0.05). Thus, if there is increased structured patient education, this will likely result in better patient compliance with safe use of ionising radiation and will help to optimise radiation exposure.

Indexed as

diagnostic radiology safety compliancemedical imaging exposureRadiation dose optimizationradiological protection practices

Identifiers

PMID42282400
PMCPMC13252249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.