Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282398›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Clinical and instrumental evaluation of primary and secondary glaucoma: Patterns and risk profiles.

Shivam Pandey, Kritika Upadhyay, Sanskriti Ukey, Shreyashi Tripathi, Shubhi Jain, Sachin Parmar

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shivam PandeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Kritika UpadhyayDepartment of Ophthalmology, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sanskriti UkeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, NandKumar Singh Chauhan Medical College Khandwa, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shreyashi TripathiDepartment of Ophthalmology, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shubhi JainDepartment of Ophthalmology, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sachin ParmarDepartment of Community Medicine V.K.S. Government Medical College, Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness that should be diagnosed and treated at an early stage. Hence, this cross-sectional study in the hospital setting was an evaluation of 270 patients with POAG, PACG, and secondary glaucomas with an evaluation of demographic, clinical, and instrumental parameters. The most prevalent subtype was POAG which was found in males aged between 51-60 years of age. The mean intraocular pressure was highest in PACG and the most common visual field defect was paracentral scotoma. Thus, we report the need to detect glaucoma early and treat it individually according to subtype and severity.

Indexed as

Glaucomaprimary angle-closure glaucomaprimary open-angle glaucomarisk factorssecondary glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID42282398
PMCPMC13252245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.