ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparative assessment of crestal bone level around non-hydrophilic and hydrophilic implants after immediate extraction: An
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immediate implant placement requires early healing and preservation of crestal bone; however, limited evidence exists regarding the comparative effect of hydrophilic implant surfaces on early bone healing and crestal bone level changes. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate crestal bone level changes around hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic dental implants placed in immediate extraction sites. Hence, a total of 30 implants were allocated into two groups. Following atraumatic extraction, implants were placed, and crestal bone levels were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. The hydrophilic group demonstrated greater early bone-forming activity with reduced crestal bone changes at 1 month compared to the non-hydrophilic group. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups at 3 and 6 months. Hydrophilic implants may therefore enhance early crestal bone formation in immediate extraction cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.