ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparison of clinical outcomes following periapical surgery in endodontics versus extraction with implant placement.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent periapical lesions challenge clinicians between periapical surgery and extraction-implant, yet long-term comparative outcomes remain limited. Hence, this retrospective cohort followed 166 patients (78 per group) for ≥24 months, comparing success rates, clinical/ radiographic outcomes, satisfaction, cost and duration after failed endodontics. Periapical surgery achieved 89.7% success, compared with 92.3% for implants (p=0.571), with comparable survival, satisfaction and periapical healing; surgery excelled in shorter duration with lower cost. Both modalities yield reliable long-term results without significant differences in efficacy. Thus, patient and tooth-specific factors are needed over modality superiority in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.