ArticleBioinformation2026
Clinical trial of dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy compared to titanium.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Titanium dental implants remain the gold standard for oral rehabilitation due to their biocompatibility and osseointegration. Therefore, it is of interest to enhance mechanical strength and stability in low-bone-volume cases where traditional implants may underperform. This randomized clinical trial compared Ti-Zr alloy implants versus conventional pure titanium implants in patients requiring prosthetic rehabilitation, evaluating primary stability, marginal bone loss, peri-implant inflammation and survival rates at regular intervals. Both implant types demonstrated comparable osseointegration rates and overall survival, with standardized clinical assessments conducted throughout the observation period. Ti-Zr implants exhibited superior mechanical stability and better peri-implant bone preservation, particularly in compromised low-density bone sites. Thus, we show Ti-Zr alloy implants as a reliable alternative to conventional titanium, especially for challenging cases requiring enhanced strength and reduced diameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.