ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparative analysis of lingual versus labial orthodontics on patient comfort and treatment efficiency.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lingual orthodontic appliances meet growing esthetic demands and are replacing traditional labial systems, yet they pose challenges to patient comfort and treatment efficiency that require comparative evaluation. Therefore, it is of interest to compare lingual versus labial fixed appliances in orthodontic patients, assessing pain perception, speech impairment, tongue irritation, oral hygiene, alignment rate, visit frequency and total duration during adaptation and follow-up phases. Patient comfort parameters and treatment efficiency metrics were collected at baseline and regular intervals and analyzed statistically across both groups. Lingual appliances showed greater initial discomfort but equivalent long-term alignment and duration outcomes to labial systems with proper case selection. Thus, we report the viability of lingual orthodontics as an esthetic alternative when patient motivation and individualized selection balance early adaptation challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.