ArticleBioinformation2026
3D predictability assessment of clear aligners versus fixed appliances using CBCT.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement varies between clear aligners and fixed appliances, yet three-dimensional comparative evidence remains limited for complex cases. This prospective study randomized 60 complex orthodontic patients to clear aligners (n=30) or fixed appliances (n=30), using baseline/planned/post-treatment CBCT superimposition to quantify accuracy across three planes of space. Clear aligners excelled in incisor torque (87.3% versus 82.2%, p=0.001) and anterior intrusion (91.2% versus 82.8%, p=0.002), while fixed appliances were superior for canine/premolar rotation (88.9% versus 78.6%, p=0.001) and anterior extrusion (85.7% versus 76.2%, p=0.004). Overall treatment predictability was comparable (clear aligners 84.6±7.8% versus fixed 82.3±8.9%, p=0.286), revealing modality-specific strengths for targeted movements. This data help in orthodontic planning by establishing CBCT-based evidence for modality selection based on movement type, enhancing precision in complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.