ArticleBioinformation2026
Prognostic value of applanation tonometry, pachymetry and automated perimetry in monitoring glaucoma progression: A longitudinal analytical study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness and accurate monitoring using intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT) and visual field analysis is essential for early detection of progression. This 24-month longitudinal analytical study evaluated the prognostic value of Goldmann applanation tonometry, pachymetry and automated perimetry in patients with primary open-angle, primary angle- closure and secondary glaucomas. Mean IOP was high in PACG and secondary angle-closure glaucoma, while CCT was greatest in secondary open- angle glaucoma and PACG and visual field loss was severe in POAG. Adjusting IOP for CCT yielded consistently lower corrected values, emphasizing the importance of pachymetry in refining glaucoma assessment and prognosis. Thus, data support a personalized, multimodal approach to glaucoma monitoring integrating IOP, CCT and visual field parameters to optimize long-term visual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.