ArticleBioinformation2026
Risk of diabetes among school going adolescents in India.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus, a leading non-communicable disease (NCD), is increasingly linked to early-life behaviors and risk factors established during adolescence. Early detection among youth is crucial for prevention. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the risk of diabetes and its associated factors among school-going adolescents aged 15-19 years in Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh. Data were collected using a pre-tested questionnaire covering socio-demographic profile, lifestyle behaviors. Anthropometric measurements and blood pressure were recorded following WHO protocols. Diabetes risk was assessed using the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) and statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and logistic regression. Most participants (91.3%) were categorized as low risk for diabetes, while 8.4% were at moderate risk and 0.3% at high risk. Elevated Body Mass Index (BMI) (Adjusted OR: 4.116; p = 0.002) and elevated blood pressure (Adjusted OR: 2.950; p = 0.020) emerged as significant predictors of diabetes risk. Waist circumference was also significantly higher among adolescents with moderate/high IDRS scores (p = 0.002).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.