ArticleBioinformation2026
Digital dentures in modern prosthodontics: Techniques, materials and clinical outcomes.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of digital technologies into complete denture fabrication has raised important questions regarding their accuracy, clinical performance and reliability compared with conventional techniques. Digital denture workflows using CAD/CAM systems, intraoral scanning and design software have simplified fabrication procedures and improved predictability. Evidence indicates that digital and conventional impression techniques demonstrate comparable accuracy with digital methods performing better for short spans and conventional materials remaining more reliable for full-arch impressions. Both subtractive milling and additive 3D printing offer distinct advantages, with milled PMMA dentures showing superior strength and dimensional stability, while printed dentures provide greater design flexibility despite weaker bonding properties. Clinically, computer-engineered dentures reduce chairside time and post-insertion adjustments while achieving patient satisfaction and quality-of-life outcomes comparable to or better than conventional dentures, though further long-term comparative studies are required to establish standardized protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.