Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282247›Full record

ArticleDigital health

What do patients consider sensitive health information? A cross-sectional survey of national patient portal users.

Saija Simola, Sari Kujala, Anna Kharko, Josefin Hagström, Charlotte Blease, Åsa Cajander, Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt, Bo Wang, Bridget Kane, Maria Hägglund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Saija SimolaDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1819-1119
Sari KujalaDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-3725
Anna KharkoDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-6173
Josefin HagströmDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2835-0259
Charlotte BleaseDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-1165
Åsa CajanderDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7472-2215
Rose-Mharie ÅhlfeldtSchool of Informatics, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-948X
Bo WangNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5667-8361
Bridget KaneDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-6529
Maria HägglundDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-3651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) offer benefits, such as supporting self-management and care engagement. However, some patients, particularly those with mental health conditions, might experience negative emotions such as worry when reading unexpected or sensitive information in their PAEHRs. Methods: A web-based survey of 4459 respondents distributed via the Finnish national patient portal included multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Respondents consisted of two patient groups who had received care either for 1) mental health or 2) other conditions. Inductive content analysis was performed to explore the kind of information that was perceived as sensitive in the PAEHR. Associations between sociodemographic factors including the type of care and reporting health information as sensitive were calculated via the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. Results: Mental health (61.3%), and intimate health (8.3%) were the most frequently mentioned as especially sensitive types of information among respondents, who also stressed that the sensitive nature of the health information depended on the context. Within the mental health information type, therapy or treatment was most often mentioned (3.5%) as sensitive. Respondents who had received mental health care were significantly more likely to perceive certain information as sensitive (53.2%) than other patients (28.8%; Adjusted OR=2.783, 95% CI=[2.333, 3.319], p<0.001). Conclusions: This study delves into the sensitive character of mental health information within PAEHR. The sensitivity of information also depends on the consequences for the patients when data will be used in another context. Documenting sensitive information carefully and safeguarding it is recommended to maintain trust in electronic health records and healthcare.

Indexed as

eHealthelectronic health recordsmedical informationmental healthnational surveynotespatient accessible electronic health recordspatient portalsensitive

Identifiers

PMID42282247
PMCPMC13250437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.