ArticleBMJ public health2026
Factors behind high caesarean section in Bangladesh: insight from a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The caesarean section (CS) rate in Bangladesh surged by 42% in 2022 compared with the prior year. This study aimed to identify the main factors influencing CS decision-making in Bangladesh. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: Global Health, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Medline and PubMed were systematically searched, and 308 studies were initially identified. Eligibility criteria: Full-text original studies addressing the CS decision-making process in Bangladesh were included. There were no restrictions on study design and publication year. Non-English publications and studies conducted outside of Bangladesh were excluded. Data extraction and synthesis: Four qualitative and two mixed-methods studies met the full inclusion criteria. The included studies generated exclusively qualitative data; therefore, verbatim qualitative data were extracted and meta-synthesis was performed to identify themes. Finally, themes were mapped onto five levels of Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory (microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and chronosystem). Results: Across the studies, 158 participants were involved, including women, their family members and clinicians. The factors related to pregnant women (microsystem)-fear of childbirth; people (mesosystem)-family and community influences; clinicians and healthcare system (exosystem)-maternal preference, previous CS, fear of litigation, lack of accountability among obstetricians, lack of skills among nurses, lack of resources, absentee staff, disrespectful labour care, private agents activities; culture (macrosystem)-role of traditional birth attendants; time and life transition (chronosystem)-CS emerged as 'better'. Conclusions: The drivers for CS in Bangladesh are complex, and interventions to reduce overuse high rates will need to address more than 'health provider preference'. However, with only six relatively small studies identified, there is insufficient data to inform programmatic direction. In a country with 3 million births annually, there is a need for large-scale studies to quantify the main factors contributing to high CS rates in both the public and private sectors. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023490645.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.