ArticleInfection prevention in practice2026
Predictive value of extra-rectal colonization and the
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors for infection in NDM-colonized patients and applicability of the Giannella Risk Score.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with rectal CRE-KPC and/or CRE-NDM colonization admitted to an intensive care unit in Argentina during a Results: Among 327 CRE rectal-colonized patients, 49.2% carried CRE-KPC, 30.3% CRE-NDM, and 20.5% were co-colonized. Overall, 10.7% developed CRE infections. Extra-rectal colonization was independently associated with infection (adjusted odds ratio: 3.5 [1.53-7.94], Conclusions: In this cohort, extra-rectal CRE colonization was the only independent predictor of subsequent infection. These findings highlight the need for carbapenemase-independent dynamic risk models better suited to mixed resistance environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.