Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282219›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2026

Text-to-flowsheet: an LLM-assisted pipeline for expert-level digitization and automated simulation of chemical processes.

Jan-Frederic Laub, Luca Bosetti, André Bardow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan-Frederic LaubEnergy and Process Systems Engineering, ETH Zurich Switzerland abardow@ethz.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6958-490X
Luca BosettiEnergy and Process Systems Engineering, ETH Zurich Switzerland abardow@ethz.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6657-6510
André BardowEnergy and Process Systems Engineering, ETH Zurich Switzerland abardow@ethz.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-0691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Converting unstructured natural language descriptions into structured process flowsheets is a fundamental bottleneck in chemical engineering, traditionally requiring years of expert training. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in text comprehension, their ability to match human expertise in modeling complex chemical process flowsheets remains unproven. Here, we present a rigorous benchmark comparing a fully automated LLM-powered digitization pipeline against the collective performance of 50 chemical engineering experts. Our pipeline leverages LLMs to extract process structures from text and formalize them as flowsheet graphs. To handle the inherent ambiguities of natural language, we utilize constrained, step-by-step prompting augmented with thermodynamic property calculations. Subsequently, the digitized flowsheet graphs are automatically translated into the flowsheeting software Aspen Plus to compute rigorous mass and energy balances. Black-box optimization on subprocess structures is used to estimate unknown parameters and ensure simulation convergence, completing the pipeline from text to converged process simulation. For the first time, we demonstrate that an automated pipeline can achieve expert-level accuracy in process topology digitization. Using a unique, newly-generated dataset of 101 expert-drawn flowsheets, we show that our LLM-assisted approach faithfully captures process topology and operating conditions even in the face of incomplete information. This work provides a robust, validated framework for the large-scale digitization of chemical production literature, contributing a transformative tool and dataset for the community to accelerate automated process design and assessment.

Identifiers

PMID42282219
PMCPMC13251679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.