ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Identifying circulating protein targets for common factors underlying schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression share substantial genetic liability. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this shared architecture remain poorly characterized. In particular, the role of circulating proteins as potential mediators and therapeutic targets is not well understood. Methods: Based on large-scale genome-wide association studies, we constructed a latent psychiatric common factor using genomic structural equation modeling. We then performed proteome-wide Mendelian randomization to estimate the associations between circulating proteins and this shared liability, based on four independent proteomic cohorts. Protein-psychiatric common factor associations were prioritized through comprehensive sensitivity analyses and colocalization. We additionally performed tissue- and single-cell expression enrichment analyses and a systematic druggability assessment. Results: We identified 36 circulating proteins with evidence of association with the psychiatric common factor that withstood multiple sensitivity analyses. Several proteins showed distinct tissue-specific expression patterns, with enrichment in brain, immune, or liver tissues, highlighting convergent neuroimmune and systemic pathways. For instance, genetically predicted higher levels of MAPK3, FES, MRE11A, HS6ST3, OLFM1, BTN3A1, BTN3A2 and BTN3A3 were associated with increased psychiatric risk, whereas higher levels of CD40, ITIH3, and ITIH4 were associated with decreased risk. Druggability assessment identified CD40, MAPK3, FES, MRE11A and BTN3A1 as established or potential therapeutic targets. Conclusions: By integrating genetic, proteomic, and transcriptomic data, this study identifies circulating proteins that associated with the shared genetic effects on three major psychiatric disorders. These findings provide biologically grounded candidates for therapeutic targeting and offer insights into shared disease mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.