ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Determinants and propagation of velocity uncertainty in 2D phase-contrast MRI.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the contributions of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and velocity-to-encoding ratio (v/VENC) to velocity uncertainty in phase-contrast (PC) MRI and to develop a framework for in vivo voxel-wise uncertainty estimation. Methods: Through-plane 2D PC-MRI of the ascending aorta was acquired using multiple velocity encodings (150, 200, 300 cm/s) and flip angles (0°, 5°, 15°, 20°) to vary v/VENC and SNR. Voxel-wise SNR and velocity uncertainty maps were generated using empirically calibrated phase-noise modeling. Phase-resolved subject-level analyses were performed to quantify the relative contributions of SNR and |v|/VENC to percent velocity uncertainty (%unc). Uncertainty was propagated to flow, stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO). Results: Velocity uncertainty varied substantially across the cardiac cycle and depended on both SNR and |v|/VENC. Across cardiac phases, |v|/VENC accounted for most explained variance in %unc (partial R Conclusion: Velocity uncertainty in PC-MRI depends on both SNR and VENC adequacy in a physiologically phase-dependent manner. Relative uncertainty may become inadequate for precise quantification in low-flow applications, such as diastolic regurgitant jets, despite adequate SNR. Spatiotemporal uncertainty mapping provides a framework for uncertainty-aware PC-MRI acquisition and interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.