ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Publications in Orthopaedics: A Ten-year Geographical and Subject Assessment.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Orthopaedic research output varies across the U.S., shaped by institutional priorities and resources. This study examines geographic trends in diversity, equity, and/or inclusion (DEI) topics within orthopaedic publications over the past decade. Methods: A search of orthopaedic surgery articles published between January 1st, 2014 to April 30th, 2024 was conducted through PubMed. Articles retrieved underwent a two-reviewer screening process to confirm primary focus of diversity topics within orthopaedics. Included articles were organized by location of the first author's institutional affiliation and year published. Article focus was then categorized by the following major categories: race/ethnicity, sex, LGBTQ+, and/or socioeconomic status. Results: Out of 424 articles which met inclusion criteria, 378 (89.2%) were published by authors affiliated with U.S. institutions. New York (n=41) and California (n=41) had the most orthopaedic publications with a DEI focus, while 13 states had zero associated publications. Sex was the most common subject of focus, followed by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and LGBTQ+. Discussion: The results of this review illustrate how there appears to be distinct geographical differences in orthopaedic publications which focused on DEI, with two states publishing a relative majority of manuscripts. Specific subtopics were also more prominent than others, with sex disparities representing the predominant focus. Our review therefore sheds light on the presence of geographic variations in DEI-related research and the potential practical significance of these trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.