Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282106›Full record

ReviewESMO gastrointestinal oncology2026

Checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer: treatment strategies, specificities, and care management questions.

T André, S Lonardi, A Zaanan, R Cohen, J Taieb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T AndréDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP Paris, France.
S LonardiVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
A ZaananDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
R CohenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP Paris, France.
J TaiebDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), defective mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status strongly predicts benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Based on the phase III KEYNOTE-177 and CheckMate 8HW trials, first-line treatment with ICIs, either anti-PD-1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy, has become the standard of care for these patients. Combination ICIs offer superior efficacy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, at the cost of a moderate increase in toxicity, particularly endocrine-related toxicities. However, 10%-30% of patients exhibit primary resistance, and secondary resistance may develop during or after treatment, highlighting the urgent need for reliable predictive biomarkers and diagnostic tools to guide personalized treatments. In case of early disease progression occurs during ICI treatment, initial priorities include confirming the MSI-H/dMMR status and identifying pseudo-progression. This review addresses the major challenges in the clinical management of patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Key questions include: What are the specificities of care for these patients? What is the optimal ICI treatment duration, and what is the role of surgery/local treatment in case of residual mass after ICI treatment? Which therapeutic options should be proposed in case of progression under ICI and in patients with tumoral

Indexed as

anti-PD-1 therapyimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapyMSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancerpredictive biomarkersresistance

Identifiers

PMID42282106
PMCPMC13251481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.