Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282105›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Paging Frequency for Internal Medicine Residents in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Prospective Observational Mixed Methods Study.

Crystal Liu, Matthew Cooper, Steven J Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Crystal LiuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Matthew CooperDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Steven J KatzDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-1393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Paging is a common form of communication in hospitals, but frequent interruptions from pages can negatively impact patient care and physician well-being. This study aimed to understand the volume and urgency of hospital pages on internal medicine residents during call shifts. Methods: Internal medicine residents at a tertiary care center in Edmonton, Canada documented pages received during evening and overnight call shifts. Data on timing, content, urgency, and importance of pages were collected. Quantitative data were obtained from centralized paging records for internal medicine subspecialties from February 2021 to February 2023. Results: Residents received an average of 13.8 pages per shift, with 58.1% being urgent and 38.2% non-urgent. Pages from nurses comprised 75.5% of total pages. Pages interrupted patient care 52.6% of the time. Interpretation: On-call internal medicine residents receive a high volume of pages, predominantly from nurses, with a considerable proportion being non-urgent and did not lead to a change in patient care. Pages frequently interrupt patient care, highlighting potential areas for improvement in communication practices. Conclusion: Hospital pages significantly interrupt on-call residents' duties, with a notable proportion being non-urgent. Alternative communication methods should be explored to improve patient care and physician well-being during on-call shifts.

Indexed as

hospital communicationon callpagingpostgraduate educationresident well-being

Identifiers

PMID42282105
PMCPMC13250421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.