Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282095›Full record

ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2026

Protocol: Long Distance Walking and Psychosocial Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review.

Hind Sabri, Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Victoria Barbeau, Tracey Howe, Howard White, Yanfei Li, Qian Liu, Weize Kong, Nina Dela Cruz, Vivian Welch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hind SabriBruyère Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Elizabeth Tanjong GhogomuBruyère Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0130-0182
Victoria BarbeauBruyère Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Tracey HoweCollege of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Howard WhiteCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yanfei LiCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Qian LiuCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Weize KongCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Nina Dela CruzCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Vivian WelchBruyère Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-7097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the protocol for a scoping review. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this scoping review is to assess the extent of the evidence of long-distance walking, defined as 20 km/12 miles or more, on physical and psychosocial outcomes in adults. Specific research questions are as follows: (1) What types of physical and psychosocial outcomes have been assessed in studies of long-distance walking in adults? (2) What types of study designs have been conducted on long-distance walking? (3) What characteristics of walking have been assessed in these studies, e.g. frequency, terrain, climate, companionship? (4) What types of people have been included in these studies (e.g., countries, age, gender or sex or other characteristics)?

Indexed as

hikinglong-distance walkingpilgrimage walkingprolonged walkingscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42282095
PMCPMC13251829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.