ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2026
PROTOCOL: Financial Literacy Programmes for the Ageing Population: An Evidence and Gap Map.
Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is the protocol for a Campbell evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: to identify and describe the available evidence on interventions designed to improve financial literacy, digital financial skills, financial decision-making, and resilience to fraud and abuse among older adults; map the scope and focus of existing research, including the type of interventions implemented, target populations, delivery modalities, and contextual factors; assess the quality of the types of evidence available, including randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, as well as qualitative studies exploring the effectiveness and acceptability of financial literacy interventions; identify evidence clusters where sufficient studies exist to support further synthesis (e.g., systematic reviews or meta-analyses) and highlight evidence gaps where additional primary research is most needed, and; provide a structured and accessible resource for policymakers, practitioners, researchers, and advocacy groups to inform the design, adaptation, and implementation of financial literacy programmes for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.