Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282088›Full record

ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2026

Agronomic Biofortification Strategies to Increase Grain Zinc Concentrations of Wheat, Rice and Maize: A Systematic Review and Network-Meta-Analysis.

Israel F N Domingos, Marcin Baranski, Zed Rengel, Paul Bilsborrow, Gavin Stewart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Israel F N DomingosDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Environment and Fishery, Higher Polytechnic Institute of Cuanza Sul, Sumbe, Angola.
Marcin BaranskiLaboratory of Neurobiology, Nencki Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Zed RengelUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Paul BilsborrowSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gavin StewartSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) malnutrition is a prevalent micronutrient deficiency that can negatively impact cognitive and physical health, especially among women and children in developing countries. One effective strategy to address low Zn levels in staple cereals (e.g. wheat, rice and maize), which are essential for human health, is Zn biofortification. There are two main approaches to Zn biofortification: genetic biofortification, which involves using the genetics of the crops to increase their Zn content, and agronomic biofortification, which uses zinc-rich fertilizers to boost the Zn levels in the edible parts of the crops. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of agronomic biofortification strategies in increasing grain zinc concentrations in major cereals, specifically wheat, rice, and maize, through a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, and agricultural journals were searched up to the year of 2017 to identify relevant field trials assessing the impact of Zn fertilisation on grain Zn concentration and yield. The search was updated in 2020. Eligible studies were those focusing on wheat, rice, and maize, field-based, addressing Zn fertilisation research question, where grain Zn concentration served as the primary outcome and grain yield as a secondary outcome. Data were extracted and assessed for quality of evidence in the included studies. Outcome data was limited to grain Zn concentration and grain yield. Pairwise and network meta-analysis for direct and indirect comparisons of Zn fertilisation methods were performed. This review summarises evidence from 44 independent field-based studies related to zinc (Zn) fertilisation, of which 27 focused on wheat, 13 on rice, and 4 on maize. These studies involved different application methods, including soil, foliar, and combined soil + foliar Zn fertilisation, compared against control groups with no Zn fertilisation. The design of the studies was randomised blocks, typically with three or four replicates. In total, 21 studies evaluated the effectiveness of soil, foliar, and combined soil + foliar Zn fertilisation methods against a control, while 15 studies focused solely on foliar application comparisons against control groups. The review highlights the prevalence of foliar Zn studies and the few instances of comparisons involving combined fertilization methods. The risk of bias in the included studies is mostly low. Soil + foliar Zn fertilisation significantly increases grain Zn concentration in wheat by 28.7 mg/kg [95%-CI: 22.77 to 34.53], while the increase is smaller for rice (6.8 mg/kg [95%-CI: 5.3 to 8.22]) and maize (7.9 mg/kg [95%-CI: 6.83 to 8.91]). Foliar Zn fertilisation also increases Zn concentration, reaching up to 18.0 mg/kg [95%-CI: 14.26 to 21.79] in wheat, 6.7 mg/kg [95%-CI: 3.25 to 10.04] in rice, and 7.6 mg/kg [95%-CI: 6.51 to 8.75] in maize, although it has minimal effects on grain yields. Conversely, soil Zn fertilisation results in a lower increase in Zn concentration, such as 4.7 mg/kg [95%-CI: 2.30 to 7.12] in wheat, with variable impacts on grain yields. Overall, considering the baseline of 16 mg/kg for rice and 25 mg/kg for wheat and maize, the effectiveness of Zn fertilisation strategies varies across different crops; the combination of soil and foliar Zn application significantly enhances grain Zn concentrations, especially in wheat with an increase of 114.8% over the baseline, while rice shows some statistically significant increase of 42.5% over the baseline, but maize does not show significant increases. Despite the biologically significant effects, there is low certainty of evidence, due mostly to high heterogeneity and unexplained inconsistency between studies. Agronomic strategies can increase wheat grain Zn concentrations, aiding in biofortification efforts to improve human Zn availability. The combination of soil and foliar applications is the most effective approach. Although increase in rice and maize grain Zn concentrations is statistically significant, it remains relatively small; however, even a slight increase (1-mg/kg) in rice could have an impact on human health due to its lower baseline Zn levels. Future research on the genetic variability of Zn concentration in rice could enhance farming practices and breeding programs, potentially incentivised by premium payments for high-Zn grain products.

Indexed as

cereal productionfood securityhuman nutritionzinc biofortificationzinc malnutrition

Identifiers

PMID42282088
PMCPMC13170438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.