Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282077›Full record

ArticleRevista Cuidarte

Sit-to-stand test as a complementary assessment in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Juan Carlos Avila-Valencia, Jhonatan Betancourt-Peña, Nicol Andrea Saavedra-Orozco, Vicente Benavides-Cordoba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan Carlos Avila-ValenciaInstitución Universitaria Escuela Nacional del Deporte. Clínica de Occidente S. A. Cali, Colombia. E-mail: rhcardiopulmonar09@gmail.com Clínica de Occidente S. A. Cali Colombia rhcardiopulmonar09@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-6428
Jhonatan Betancourt-PeñaInstitución Universitaria Escuela Nacional del Deporte. Cali, Colombia. E-mail: johnnatanbp@hotmail.com Institución Universitaria Escuela Nacional del Deporte Cali Colombia johnnatanbp@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7292-7628
Nicol Andrea Saavedra-OrozcoInstitución Universitaria Escuela Nacional del Deporte. Cali, Colombia. E-mail: orozconicolandrea@gmail.com Institución Universitaria Escuela Nacional del Deporte Cali Colombia orozconicolandrea@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4205-9005
Vicente Benavides-CordobaUniversidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia. E-mail: vicente.benavides@correounivalle.edu.co Universidad del Valle Cali Colombia vicente.benavides@correounivalle.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9129-0183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The 1-Minute Sit to Stand Test (STS1) has gained relevance as a simple, safe, and functional test in patients with cardiovascular disease, especially in settings where the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is not feasible. Its usefulness in assessing lower-extremity muscle strength makes it a complementary tool of increasing interest that can strengthen functional assessment batteries in this population. Objective: To assess the correlation between the 6MWT and the STS1 as complementary tools in the functional assessment of patients with cardiovascular disease. Materials and Methods: Descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study conducted in 45 patients enrolled in a cardiac rehabilitation program at a quaternary care clinic in Cali, Colombia. The 6MWT and STS1 were administered, assessing physiological variables and physical performance variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for bivariate analysis. Results: The mean age was 62.97 ± 12.58 years; 64.4% were women. Coronary artery disease was the most common diagnosis (73.3%). A moderate positive correlation was found between the distance walked in the 6MWT and the number of repetitions in the STS1 (r=0.610; p<0.001). The 6MWT elicited a greater increase in heart rate (final: 112.7 ± 18.1), whereas the STS1 had a greater impact on systolic blood pressure (final SBP: 146.8 ± 27.9; p<0.001). Discussion: The results are consistent with studies in other populations and support the use of STS1 as a valid functional assessment option. Conclusion: The STS1 complements the 6MWT in the functional assessment of patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesExercise TestWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID42282077
PMCPMC13249892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.