ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026
Design and rationale of the RISC-trial: multicentre
Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06472375 (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Clinical Benefit of 24-hour in Hospital Observation of Syncope Patients Admitted to the Cardiac Emergency Room), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Clinical Benefit of 24-hour in Hospital Observation of Syncope Patients Admitted to the Cardiac Emergency Room
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Syncope is responsible for 1-3% of emergency department presentations. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines on syncope recommend a structured initial evaluation to diagnose syncope patients. If the cause of the syncopal event remains unexplained, risk-stratification is applied to distinguish between patients at high risk of serious cardiovascular events and low-risk patients, who can be safely discharged. However, there is a group of patients in whom this risk can currently not be adequately determined, hereafter called intermediate risk. In clinical practice, these patients are either immediately discharged or admitted for 24 h in-hospital cardiac rhythm monitoring. Due to the high cost of admission, immediate discharge could lower healthcare costs, hospital bed utilization, and patient burden. To our knowledge, there is no sufficient scientific basis for the superiority of either. The RISC trial aims to resolve this knowledge gap. Study Design: The RISC trial is an investigator-initiated multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 640 predefined low- and intermediate-risk syncope patients are randomized to either immediate discharge or discharge after 24 h in-hospital rhythm monitoring (1:1). The trial is powered to claim non-inferiority of immediate discharge with respect to (non-)fatal composite safety endpoints, which entail arrhythmic disorders, syncope recurrence, and (cardiovascular)death. Furthermore, healthcare costs and quality of life will be evaluated. Conclusion: The RISC trial is a multicentre RCT that aims to gather scientific evidence for immediate discharge of the ESC guideline-based pre-defined low- and intermediate-risk syncope patients in the emergency department. Primary endpoints entail cardiovascular events such as arrhythmias, syncope, and death. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with trial-ID: NCT06472375.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.