ReviewEuropean heart journal open2026
Definitions and outcomes reported in studies investigating the management of new onset atrial fibrillation in acutely unwell patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a scoping review.
Review in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) frequently occurs in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), yet definitions and outcome reporting remain inconsistent across clinical studies. This heterogeneity impedes evidence synthesis and limits the development of standardized management strategies. A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting on NOAF in acutely unwell ICU patients. Data on arrhythmia definitions and reported outcomes were extracted and categorized using the ISPOR framework. This is the first study to systematically examine and compare diagnostic criteria for NOAF in ICU-based research. Out of 8477 records, 44 studies (4 RCTs, 12 prospective, and 28 retrospective observational studies) met inclusion criteria. Significant heterogeneity was found in how NOAF was defined, including arrhythmia duration thresholds, diagnostic criteria, and heart rate cut-offs. Outcomes were primarily clinician-reported (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.