ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026
Oral anticoagulation discontinuation after atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phenotype-Guided Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: From Rate Control to Catheter Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The need for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) after apparently successful atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation remains uncertain. Although ablation reduces AF recurrence, it is unclear whether this translates into a low stroke risk to sufficiently discontinue anticoagulation. This systematic review assesses whether stopping OAC after successful AF ablation affects thromboembolic or bleeding risk. Methods and results: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus up to 13 November 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling adults with AF who underwent catheter ablation and were subsequently randomized to continue or discontinue OAC. Outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. The primary endpoints were stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Three RCTs met inclusion criteria ( Conclusion: In patients who remain arrhythmia-free after AF ablation, stopping OAC did not increase thromboembolic events and substantially reduced major bleeding, suggesting that in post-ablation patients with low thromboembolic risk, and no demonstration of AF relapse for at least 6-12 months, discontinuation of OAC may be potentially safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.