Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42282037›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Effectiveness of maternal COVID-19 vaccination varies by gestational timing: results from a claims-based cohort study, 2020-2022.

Stacey L Rowe, Matthew M Coates, Sheena G Sullivan, Julia J Koerber, Flor M Muñoz, Onyebuchi A Arah, Annette K Regan

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stacey L RoweKaiser Permanente.
Matthew M CoatesUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
Sheena G SullivanMonash University.
Julia J KoerberUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
Flor M MuñozBaylor College of Medicine.
Onyebuchi A ArahUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
Annette K ReganKaiser Permanente.

Funding

Uptake, Safety and Effectiveness of COVID‐19 Vaccines during PregnancyR01AI169239 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO · PI REGAN, ANNETTE KARENA · 2022 to 2024
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI169239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) during pregnancy by dose and trimester in a claims-based cohort of 414,909 pregnant women from 25 December 2020 to 16 September 2022. Vaccination was modeled as a time-varying exposure using weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate VE against medically-attended COVID-19 and COVID-19-related hospitalization. Overall, 58,975 (14.2%) women received ≥ 1 dose during pregnancy. We identified 39,202 COVID-19 cases, including 1,130 hospitalizations, with most outcomes (> 93%) occurring during unvaccinated person-time. VE against medically-attended COVID-19 was low-to-moderate across trimesters, with the highest estimates after late second trimester vaccination (36.3%, 95% CI: 26.9-44.4) or ≥ 2 doses (40.7%, 95% CI: 26.3-52.3). VE against hospitalization was higher, albeit with wider confidence intervals (late second trimester, 73.1%, 95% CI: 13.3-91.6). COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy provided meaningful maternal protection, particularly against severe disease, with some indications that protection may be greatest when given during later gestational periods.

Indexed as

COVID-19pregnancySARS-CoV-2trimestervaccine

Identifiers

PMID42282037
PMCPMC13252563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.