Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281990›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Two fork protection complexes at the replication fork play distinct roles in fork progression and stress response.

Sameera Vipat, Rohan Harolikar, Naga Raviteja Chavata, Karina Šapovalovaitė, Syed Shahid Musvi, Arthur Morgunov, Sigvard Vällo, Tatiana N Moiseeva

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sameera VipatDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12618, ESTONIA.
Rohan HarolikarDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA.
Naga Raviteja ChavataDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12618, ESTONIA.
Karina ŠapovalovaitėDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12618, ESTONIA.
Syed Shahid MusviDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12618, ESTONIA.
Arthur MorgunovDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12618, ESTONIA.ORCID 0009-0003-2585-0546
Sigvard VälloDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12618, ESTONIA.
Tatiana N MoiseevaDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12618, ESTONIA.ORCID 0000-0002-1181-9519

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHRISTOPHER J. BAKKENIST · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Mechanistic insights into the initiation of DNA replication in human cellsR35GM161292 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Tatiana Moiseeva · 2026 to 2026
$434k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM161292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TIMELESS, together with TIPIN and CLASPIN, forms the Fork Protection Complex (FPC), an essential regulator of DNA replication that possesses multiple functions in genome stability including the regulation of fork progression and replication checkpoint signaling. Structural studies place TIMELESS at the leading edge of the CMG helicase, which is inconsistent with FPC functions at the lagging strand and on single-stranded DNA. Our observation that FPC chromatin loading during replication initiation started in G1 phase cells, but was also enhanced by DNA synthesis, led us to propose a model of a step-wise loading of the FPC with two TIMELESS molecules per replication fork. Split-TurboID proximity labelling supported this model, placing the second FPC in proximity to the lagging strand. Using an auxin-inducible degron, we show that TIMELESS depletion compromised chromatin loading of TIPIN and CLASPIN, but the TIMELESS mutant unable to bind MCM still supported CLASPIN and TIPIN chromatin loading. This mutant was proficient in replication checkpoint activation, but failed to regulate fork speed under both unperturbed and oxidative-stress conditions. We propose that two distinct FPC instances at each replication fork: one at the leading edge, regulating fork progression, and one at the lagging strand mediating checkpoint signaling, - together execute the essential functions of TIMELESS.

Identifiers

PMID42281990
PMCPMC13252541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.