ArticleResearch square2026
Speech-Derived Digital Markers of Treatment Response and Improvement Trajectories in Pediatric Anxiety.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in youth. Exposure-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (EF-CBT) is the first-line treatment, yet a substantial proportion of youth do not achieve full response. Clinicians currently lack scalable, objective markers to monitor treatment response as it unfolds during therapy, limiting the ability to make timely, data-informed treatment adjustments. This study examined whether youth speech features (acoustic and linguistic) from EF-CBT session audio recordings could predict anxiety improvement and model trajectories of response across treatment. The sample included 603 recorded sessions from 60 youth aged 7 to 17 years participating in a randomized clinical trial of 12-session EF-CBT. Improvement was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) scores between sessions, assessed by independent evaluators. Machine learning models were developed using data from pairs of sessions within individuals to predict whether improvement occurred between those sessions and were evaluated using internal cross-validation. Models using later-session features performed better than those using early-session features (AUC = 0.86 vs 0.82), indicating good discrimination between improvement and non-improvement. Acoustic features reflecting vocal variability and expressiveness (e.g., variation in pitch, loudness, and voice activity) were the most consistent predictors of improvement. A hybrid Empirical Bayes approach integrating speech-based model predictions with PARS-based priors produced the most accurate and clinically plausible trajectories compared to other approaches tested. These findings suggest that speech-derived markers may provide a scalable, session-level measure to support continuous monitoring of treatment response during EF-CBT for pediatric anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.