ArticleResearch square2026
A compact and efficient physics-informed architecture for reconstructing and predicting complex physical fields from low accuracy sparse data.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex physical fields are traditionally characterized through high-fidelity simulations or dense sensor networks, which provide detailed information but are often computationally or experimentally costly. Deep learning offers a promising approach for reconstructing and forecasting such fields from limited observations. However, many existing AI-based models rely on large labeled datasets and heavily parameterized architectures, making the models both data-intensive and computationally demanding to train. To overcome these limitations, we introduce compact and computationally efficient physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) designed to reduce both architectural complexity and computational overhead. We demonstrate its performance to reconstruct and forecast complex fields with limited or low accuracy multiscale spatiotemporal dynamics using laminar and turbulent flows as representative benchmarks. We first demonstrate accurate super-resolution of lid-driven cavity flows at Reynolds numbers up to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.