ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2024
TESTING FOR THE CAUSAL MEDIATION EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE MEDIATORS USING THE KERNEL MACHINE DIFFERENCE METHOD IN GENOME-WIDE EPIGENETIC STUDIES.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal Mediation Analysis for Integrating Exposure, Genomic, and Phenotype Data.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025Article
- TESTING FOR THE CAUSAL MEDIATION EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE MEDIATORS USING THE KERNEL MACHINE DIFFERENCE METHOD IN GENOME-WIDE EPIGENETIC STUDIES.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid growth of high-throughput genomic and epigenomic data enables exploration of biological mechanisms underlying diseases causing processes beyond traditional association studies. Using the causal mediation analysis framework, we develop the kernel machine difference (KMD) method, which provides a testing procedure for detecting the mediation effects of a set of mediators, for example, the DNA methylation probes within a region or a gene. Our method extends the difference method in single mediator analysis to jointly model the mediatory role of the methylation of multiple neighboring probes, as they often work together in a collaborative fashion. Kernel machine regression is employed to accommodate flexible parametric and nonparametric effects of multiple mediators on the outcome and to allow for robust testing for the joint natural indirect effect (NIE). The proposed testing procedure does not require explicit modeling of the dependence of multiple mediators on exposure and confounders and the correlation among multiple mediators. It hence provides a robust and computationally efficient tool, especially for genomic regions with moderate to high-dimensional probes. We evaluate the performance of the proposed test using extensive simulations and demonstrate its gain in robustness and power when the effects are nonlinear. We apply the proposed test to the analysis of the epigenome-wide Normative Aging Study (NAS) to investigate the mediatory role of DNA methylation in the causal pathway between smoking behavior and lung function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.