ArticleTobacco use insights2026
Social Media Engagement, Youth E-Cigarette Use, and the Moderating Potential of Harm Perceptions.
Article in Tobacco use insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strengthening Adolescent E-CIGARETTE Prevention Through Digital Literacy and Responsible Artificial Intelligence.Tobacco use insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescent electronic cigarette use is a significant public health concern due to its potential for negative health effects and prevalence among youth. The primary aim of the current study is to examine the moderation effect of perceived harm (i.e., low versus high) on the relation between passive and active social media use and past 30-day adolescent e-cigarette use. We hypothesized that the relation between type of social media use and e-cigarette use would be contingent on the level of perceived harm. Aims and Method: This study was conducted via secondary data analysis with the public use files from the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey that provides a nationally representative sample (N = 22,069) of youth in the United States. The primary analysis consisted of logistic regression that accounted for complex survey sampling and missing data; primarily testing for a moderation effect. Results: We found a significant omnibus interaction, F(2,37) = 3.83, Conclusions: We found that high versus low perceived harm moderated the relationship between passive and active engagement with e-cigarette-related social media content and past 30-day e-cigarette use for a nationally representative sample of adolescents in the U.S. Based on these findings, prevention strategies targeting adolescent e-cigarette use may be enhanced through tailoring educational messaging that focus on the potential effects of exposure to e-cigarette related social media content in conjunction with the known effects of using e-cigarettes on one's health. Implications: Examining the moderating effects of variables provides a greater understanding of the ways multiple factors interplay and influence adolescent e-cigarette use. The results of the current study demonstrated that differences between perceived levels of harm occurred at each category of social media use, while these differences were most pronounced between the passive use and the high active use social media categories. Prevention strategies targeting adolescent e-cigarette use may be enhanced through tailoring educational messaging and teaching strategies that focus on the potential effects of exposure to e-cigarette related social media content in conjunction with the known biological effects of using e-cigarettes on one's health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.