ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2026
Brain Tumor Segmentation Using U-Net With ResNet50 Encoder for Enhanced MRI Analysis.
Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain Tumor Segmentation Using U-Net With ResNet50 Encoder for Enhanced MRI Analysis.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate brain tumor segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains a challenging task due to the high variability in tumor appearance, shape, and location. Manual segmentation is time-consuming, subjective, and impractical for large-scale clinical use, highlighting the need for robust automated solutions. This study introduces an enhanced U-Net architecture with a ResNet50 encoder, designed to improve feature extraction through deeper convolutional layers and residual connections. By reformulating tumor delineation as a pixel-level segmentation problem rather than image-level classification, the model achieves more precise boundary detection. Trained on the publicly available TCGA-LGG dataset, the proposed model significantly outperformed the baseline U-Net, achieving a Dice score of 0.9659, an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.9567, and a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.9253. These results demonstrate superior segmentation capability compared to standard U-Net and are competitive with recent state-of-the-art methods. The findings highlight the potential of the proposed framework as a proof of concept for integration into clinical decision support, while also underscoring the need for future validation on larger, multi-institutional datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.