ArticlePopulation research and policy review2023
Bearing the Reproductive Load? Unequal Reproductive Careers Among U.S. Women.
Article in Population research and policy review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women's Reproductive Health Conditions and Fertility Goals.Population research and policy review · 2026Article
- Motherhood Biographies and Health over the Life Course.Sociology compass · 2025Article
- Reproductive capital: theoretical foundations and empirical evidence from the workplace.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Being (a) patient-navigating desire through online communities in assisted reproductive technology.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproductive events such as infertility, abortion, or unintended pregnancies are often framed as discrete outcomes in scholarly research. This silo-ed approach is quite distinct from how people experience their reproductive lives as embodied and interconnected throughout the life course. In this analysis, we build on and further a "reproductive careers" framework to better account for the number (density) and distinct types (complexity) of reproductive events that cisgender women experience across their life course. We incorporate insights from scholarship on stratified reproduction, cumulative (dis)advantage, and health to conceptualize and empirically examine how women's reproductive careers are potentially unequally patterned. Using reproductive history data on 4351 U.S. women from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, we find that Black and Hispanic women, women of lower socioeconomic status, and women with limited healthcare access have both denser and more complex reproductive careers than their more structurally advantaged peers. As summary indicators, density and complexity may offer proxies for the "reproductive load" that subgroups of women differentially experience across the life course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.