Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281909›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2026

Defining female gluteal geometry for preoperative planning in body contouring.

Edoardo Raposio, Elisa Bertulla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edoardo RaposioPlastic Surgery Chair, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, Italy.
Elisa BertullaPlastic Surgery Chair, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing prevalence of procedures aimed at modifying the female body silhouette-particularly gluteoplasty, liposuction, and the Brazilian butt lift (BBL)-highlights the need for a sufficient number of reference points and lines to objectively describe these interventions and assess their outcomes. Material and methods: For the lateral profile, we identified five horizontal reference lines, all parallel to one another, drawn through what we consider the principal landmarks of the posterior trunk curvature. For the posterior view, five horizontal lines were similarly drawn, parallel to one another, corresponding to key posterior landmarks. After tracing these lines in both the lateral and posterior views, we assessed whether recognizable geometric shapes and/or relationships could be identified among them. Results: We observed that attractive proportions of the lateral female pelvis can be inscribed within a cone-shaped ovoid oriented at approximately 50° relative to the vertical axis. In the posterior view, rectangles and two ovoids may also be identified. Conclusions: In our view, describing geometric parameters may contribute to a more systematic and standardized framework for characterization and preoperative planning.Combining lateral and posterior reference lines allowed identification of multiple geometric configurations, including rectangles and ovoids, which may facilitate visualization of spatial relationships among gluteal structures.

Indexed as

Brazilian butt liftButtocks aestheticsFemale beautyFemale profileGluteoplasty

Identifiers

PMID42281909
PMCPMC13251492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.